Page 1 of 1
0 = 1 = 0
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:41 am
by MetaphysicalPolitics
Just thinking about dropping some knowledge.
Re: 0 = 1 = 0
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:22 pm
by Ramscha
11=2=0 [rolleyes]
Re: 0 = 1 = 0
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 8:15 pm
by MetaphysicalPolitics
Ramscha wrote:11=2=0 [rolleyes]
Anything wrong?
Re: 0 = 1 = 0
Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2013 12:45 am
by Ramscha
Just thought about dropping some knowledge
MetaphysicalPolitics wrote: Ramscha wrote:11=2=0 [rolleyes]
Anything wrong?
Just thought about dropping some knowledge [crazy]
But to reveal this "mysterious" equation:
11 is the number of magick and the number which Crowley supposedly claimed for himself ( actually no wonder considering this guy called himself "Megaterion")
2 is the cross sum of 11 and the number of the twins Horus - Seth, son and daughter.
0 is 0, nothing special except that the following mathematicla step was implicated : (1) + (-1); which supposedly meant to show that the number 1 has two sides, as every number has.
Mathematic is a language full with miracles, so colourful like it would lead directly into the abyssos.
See you there, guys
Ramscha
Re: 0 = 1 = 0
Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2013 12:53 am
by MetaphysicalPolitics
Ramscha wrote:Just thought about dropping some knowledge
MetaphysicalPolitics wrote: Ramscha wrote:11=2=0 [rolleyes]
Anything wrong?
Just thought about dropping some knowledge [crazy]
But to reveal this "mysterious" equation:
11 is the number of magick and the number which Crowley supposedly claimed for himself ( actually no wonder considering this guy called himself "Megaterion")
2 is the cross sum of 11 and the number of the twins Horus - Seth, son and daughter.
0 is 0, nothing special except that the following mathematicla step was implicated : (1) + (-1); which supposedly meant to show that the number 1 has two sides, as every number has.
Mathematic is a language full with miracles, so colourful like it would lead directly into the abyssos.
See you there, guys
Ramscha
Are you mocking me?
Re: 0 = 1 = 0
Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2013 1:19 am
by Ramscha
Just a small sarcastic undertone combined with special innuendos related to the topic (more or less) [tongue]
And to come back to the equation, you can read a little bit of it in Kenneth Grants "Outside the Circles of time", an older one, but still interesting book.
I prefer that instead of dubious videos. But one should keep in mind to drop random formulas is not necessarily something useful, mathematics sure follows rules, some beyond the logic of many men, but still straight rules.
Ramscha
Re: 0 = 1 = 0
Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:09 am
by Clockwork Ghost
MetaphysicalPolitics wrote:
Are you mocking me?
Ramscha doesnt appear to be mocking you here - he's simply put up a different 'magical equation', and then has backed himself by explaining it to you. It may help to facillitate discussion if you posted more detail in your posts so that it is more obvious as to what you're trying to say - I've noticed a couple of posts that have no real body to them, which would suggest that you're not so much interested in discussing the topic as just posting a statement with no scope for discussion.
I mean, this is a forum for discussing matters of the occult, not just simply posting statements.
Re: 0 = 1 = 0
Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2013 4:49 am
by Asurendra
My skepticism here is about the method. When trying to unpack numbers and the meaning of words one can create a wide of variety of complex structures which only APPEAR profound, but which rest on phantom foundations. David Wilcox and Santos Bonachi put forth very intricate arguments based on 'Sacred Geometry' that we were entering the 5th dimension on 21DEC12 and it was all prestidigitation. It's the same with Jordan Maxwell and his intricate verbal games. I recall ENDLESS arguments over the 'hidden meaning' of words in Hebrew and Greek when I was younger and how it drove me crazy. One of my favorites was to try and get them to find the 'hidden link' revealed between CHiTooL & CHaTool: 'diaper' and 'cat' (Hebrew).
I have a sense of what MetaphysicalPolitics is striving for, but, I personally don't feel that try to construct this in terms of physics equation or symbolic logic is really helpful, especially in this format.
Re: 0 = 1 = 0
Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 7:30 pm
by arpee
zero does NOT equal one.
zero sticks are different than one stick.
-1 + 1 = 0
positive one and negative one makes zero.
All of the numbers positive, together wit their negative opposites equals zeroes. So zero is the sum of all numbers and it equals none of them.
Re: 0 = 1 = 0
Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 9:39 pm
by Asurendra
Arpee,
This character MetaphysicalPolitics was, at best, a self-deluded preteen stewing in a mental garbage can of rotting ideas but in all probability he is a paranoid schizophrenic. People gave him a chance and tried to communicate with him. In short, he could not be reached and nothing he posted was even vaguely connected with anything valid. My opinion is that it is not worth bothering with the flypaper of someone's delusions.
I hope I am not bullying since he has descended back to the realm of wind and ghosts and is no longer here.
Re: 0 = 1 = 0
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 2:13 pm
by Nahemah
I'll apply a little Russell to the equation:
Bertrand Russell, in a lecture on logic, mentioned that in the sense of material implication, a false proposition implies any proposition.
A student raised his hand and said "In that case, given that 1 = 0, prove that you are the Pope".
Russell immediately replied, "Add 1 to both sides of the equation: then we have 2 = 1. The set containing just me and the Pope has 2 members. But 2 = 1, so it has only 1 member; therefore, I am the Pope."
Bertrand Russell was a Mathematician among his many other talents and the above is a 'prime' [ooh punny,lol] example of reductio ad absurdum, re: the application and extrapolation of false premises to an apparently logical conclusion.
As Ramscha and Asurenda point out,this is prestigitation at it's finest. [thumbup]
This character MetaphysicalPolitics was, at best, a self-deluded preteen stewing in a mental garbage can of rotting ideas but in all probability he is a paranoid schizophrenic. People gave him a chance and tried to communicate with him. In short, he could not be reached and nothing he posted was even vaguely connected with anything valid. My opinion is that it is not worth bothering with the flypaper of someone's delusions.
I hope I am not bullying since he has descended back to the realm of wind and ghosts and is no longer here.
I agree with Case that the posts made on the forum thus far are more statement than discussion material and that they are poorly framed,however I'd rather not cast aspersions as to Metaphysical Politics character outside of that.
People can be deluded about many things,for just as many reasons and youth and/or mental instability or disorders of thought are not necessarily the only or most valid precursors to that.
I am aware that MP is 17,which is young enough to be impressionable and perhaps a little over enthusiastic in pursuit of truths,but this alone does not imply anything regarding his mental health so we should not resort to labelling him as deficient or damaged in this regard.
We have a number of members here who have mental health issues and those who have struggled with such issues in the past also and it's not fair to assume that a mental health issue automatically makes one an unfit Occultist or member here,any more than youthful impetousity does either.
I'm not hazing you here,Asurendra,but I do think you could have chosen your words more wisely in this regard and I must admit, it's something I've also been guilty of doing inadvertently,at various points too. [thumbup]
Re: 0 = 1 = 0
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 7:10 pm
by Asurendra
I stand corrected.
Re: 0 = 1 = 0
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 10:38 pm
by MetaphysicalPolitics
Asurendra wrote:Arpee,
This character MetaphysicalPolitics was, at best, a self-deluded preteen stewing in a mental garbage can of rotting ideas but in all probability he is a paranoid schizophrenic. People gave him a chance and tried to communicate with him. In short, he could not be reached and nothing he posted was even vaguely connected with anything valid. My opinion is that it is not worth bothering with the flypaper of someone's delusions.
I hope I am not bullying since he has descended back to the realm of wind and ghosts and is no longer here.
I am back; I am not a preteen (I'm 17, meaning that I'm closer to being an adult), and I am not a "paranoid schizophrenic".
Wait until tomorrow as I will drop some deeper knowledge. I'm already about to write my paper breaking down my ideas.
Re: 0 = 1 = 0
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 12:19 am
by Asurendra
Please note my response to the slight hazing from Nahemah addressing what you posted. I admit when I'm wrong.
This is an example of your not listening and responding to what people say.
Re: 0 = 1 = 0
Posted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 12:03 pm
by autodydact
I believe it was tarkowsky who proved in his film Nostlghia that 1+1=1. If you catch two drops of water in a glass, you have one bigger drop, not two.
Re: 0 = 1 = 0
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 4:56 am
by PeacockAngel
0 = 2
Technically this is kinda dumb, but Crowley (and I) love unnecessary complication. The formula states that (+1) + (-1) = 0, it's an equation representing the union of opposites.