Questions about the Golden Dawn elemental weapons
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:10 am
Okay, so I've been working my way up to where I would construct, one by one, the four elemental "weapons" of the Golden Dawn system (but not consecrating them yet). The design gives me a couple of questions from a practical and symbolic point of view.
1) For all of the weapons: How important is it to have the Rose Cross sigils along with the Names? I can see where the Names would be useful, to reinforce their attribution to the particular element. But if one needed the Rose Cross sigils associated with those names, they could just use the Hebrew letters (written on the weapons) with the Rose Cross and derive it themselves; an Adept in the R.R. et A.C. would have made and consecrated the Rose Cross Lamen in addition to the weapons. Since my handwriting tends to be rather large, would the tools suffer if they didn't have the sigils of the Names drawn on them?
2) For the Fire Wand: Is there a particular symbolic requirement that the wand have three red sections (separated by four yellow rings)? The total number of names to be written on the wand is eight, including the Motto; if there were four sections instead of three, all of the names could fit evenly without having to be written on the red parts of the bulb at the far end. Any particular reason why it should stay at three?
3) For the Earth Pentacle: What goes on the back? Regardie's books say that the front and back of the Pentacle should be identical (color flipping notwithstanding), but most modern Pentacles I've seen online only have the hexagram, border and Names drawn on one side, and the back plain except for the four colors. Since the other tools only have each Name written once, it seems a bit unbalanced to have them all written on both sides of the Pentacle. I think that simply writing four of the names on one side, and the other four on the other side (with the Motto facing the Magician in use), would make sense. Am I the only one who thinks this?
1) For all of the weapons: How important is it to have the Rose Cross sigils along with the Names? I can see where the Names would be useful, to reinforce their attribution to the particular element. But if one needed the Rose Cross sigils associated with those names, they could just use the Hebrew letters (written on the weapons) with the Rose Cross and derive it themselves; an Adept in the R.R. et A.C. would have made and consecrated the Rose Cross Lamen in addition to the weapons. Since my handwriting tends to be rather large, would the tools suffer if they didn't have the sigils of the Names drawn on them?
2) For the Fire Wand: Is there a particular symbolic requirement that the wand have three red sections (separated by four yellow rings)? The total number of names to be written on the wand is eight, including the Motto; if there were four sections instead of three, all of the names could fit evenly without having to be written on the red parts of the bulb at the far end. Any particular reason why it should stay at three?
3) For the Earth Pentacle: What goes on the back? Regardie's books say that the front and back of the Pentacle should be identical (color flipping notwithstanding), but most modern Pentacles I've seen online only have the hexagram, border and Names drawn on one side, and the back plain except for the four colors. Since the other tools only have each Name written once, it seems a bit unbalanced to have them all written on both sides of the Pentacle. I think that simply writing four of the names on one side, and the other four on the other side (with the Motto facing the Magician in use), would make sense. Am I the only one who thinks this?