Levi on Evocation vs. Magick Psychology

Post Reply
Occult Forum Archive
Magister
Magister
Posts: 287885
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:32 am

Levi on Evocation vs. Magick Psychology

Post by Occult Forum Archive »

Original post: Specktackular

The reason I am putting this up here is so that we can analyze what he is saying in relation to more modern interpretations of magic and the psychology of consciousness.

This is from the chapter entitled "Evocation" from Eliphas Levi's "The Great Secret or Occultism Unveiled"....
Reason alone gives the right to liberty. Liberty and reason, these two great and essential privileges of mankind, are so closely united that one cannot be renounced unless the use of the other is also given up. Liberty wills the triumph of reason and reason imperiously demands the reign of liberty. Liberty and reason are more important than life itself to man. It is beautiful to die for liberty, and it is sublime to be a martyr for reason, because reason and liberty are the very essense of the soul's immortality.

God Himself is the free reason of all that exists.

The devil, on the other hand, is fatal irrationalism.

To forswear one's reason or one's liberty is disown God. To make any appeal to what is irrational or fatalistic is to evoke the devil. We have already said that the devil does exist, and that he is a thousand times more horrible and pitiless than the legends describe him, even at their most gruesome. For us and for reason, he could not possibly be the fine fallen angel of Milton, nor flashing Lucifer, trailing his starry glory through the night with here and there the glitter of lightning. Such titanic fables are impious. The true devil is the one sculptured in our cathedrals and depicted by the naive illuminators of our Gothic books. His essentially hybrid form is the synthesis of all nightmares; it is hideous, deformed and grotesque. He is fettered and binds others in fetters. He has eyes everywhere, except in his head; he has faces in his stomach, in his knees, and on his unspeakably filthy rump. He is everywhere where folly can find a footing, and everywhere he drags behind him the torments of hell.

He himself does not utter a syllable, but he makes all our vices speak; he is athe ventriloquist who operates the gluttons, the Python of abandoned women. At times his voice is as impetuous as the whirlwind, at times it is as insinuating as a low hiss. To converse with our troubled brains he inserts his forked tongue into our ears and to undo our hearts he shakes his tail like an arrow. In our head he slays reason, in our hearts, he poisons liberty, and he does this always and of necessity unremittingly, be cause he is not a person but a blind force; he is accursed, but accursed with us; he is a sinner, but he sins in us. We alone are responsible for the evil which he makes us do, because as for him, he has neither liberty nor reason.

The devil is the beast; Saint John hammers this home in his marvellous Apocalypse; but how can one comprehend the Apocalypse without the keys of the holy Qabalah?

An evocation, therefore, is an appeal to the beast, and only the beast can respond. We might add that to make the beast appear one must first form it within oneself and then project it outside. This secret is that of al the grimoires, but it was only expressed by the ancient masters in a very veiled manner.

To see the devil it is necessary to make oneself up like the devil and then look in a mirror. This is the secret in its simplicity, so that even a child could understand it. Let us add for the benefit of men that, in the mysteries of sorcerers, the devilish countenance is imprinted on the soul by the astral intermediary, and the mirror is darkness animated as the head reals.

Every evocation would be in vain if the magician did not commence by damning his soul in sacrificing for ever his liberty and his reason. It is easy to understand this. To create the beast in us it is essential to kill the man; which is what was represented previously by the sacrifice of a child, and even more distinctly by the profanation of a host. The man who elects to perform an evocation is a wretch who is embarrassed by reason and wishes to magnify in himself the beastial appetites, so that he can turn this into a magnetic centre endowed with a fatal influence. He wishes to personify unreason and fatalism; he wishes to become a disordered magnet, and an evil one too, to attract to himself the vices and the gold which feed them. It is the most terrible crime which the imagination could dream of. It is the rape of nature. It is the direct and absolute outrage thrown in the face of divinity; but also, and happily so, it is a frightfully difficult task, and most of those who have attempted it have come unstuck in the accomplishment. If a man who was strong enough and perverse enough were to evoke the devil in the required conditions, the devil would materialize. God would be held back and terror-stricken nature would be subjected to the despotism of evil.
Now... much of what Levi says here makes a great deal of sense to me. Liberty and Reason are what Jung would refer to as the "Self" or what Roberto Assagioli would refer to as the "Conscious Self". Certainly, this fits somewhere on Leary's 8-Circuit model of the mind.

But, just as "liberty" and "reason" are the makeup of the Self, or as Levi calls it, "man's immortal soul," everyone is aware of various compartments of mind which, whatever you call them, are not the realm of reason or liberty. In fact, these realms of the unconscious, superconscious, id or whatever are all quite beyond reason and quite beyond one's control. Societal imprints and early habits, repression and neurosis make up a large portion of an unrecognized whole personality.

It is these unrecognized aspects of the whole personality that are identified on the Qabalistic Tree of Life and it is by bringing these unconscious realms to the forefront of consciousness that the process of self-realization or "individuation" can occur.

There is a lot more that can be added here about "demons as aspects of the human mind," but I'm not sure what exactly. This is somewhat of a popular opinion these days that "demons are all in your mind, you just have no idea how big your mind is" ... or, as Levi says:
An evocation, therefore, is an appeal to the beast, and only the beast can respond. We might add that to make the beast appear one must first form it within oneself and then project it outside. This secret is that of al the grimoires, but it was only expressed by the ancient masters in a very veiled manner.

To see the devil it is necessary to make oneself up like the devil and then look in a mirror.
What do you think?

Occult Forum Archive
Magister
Magister
Posts: 287885
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:32 am

Levi on Evocation vs. Magick Psychology

Post by Occult Forum Archive »

Original post: DeviouZ

Fascinating... essentially he's describing that entity that Crowley described as Choronzon. The entity that is behind all falsehood, behind all illusion, ignorance, that which blinds us from real reason and liberty. I don't know the context of the book, why does he assume that all evocation necessarily has to be of the devil?

Occult Forum Archive
Magister
Magister
Posts: 287885
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:32 am

Levi on Evocation vs. Magick Psychology

Post by Occult Forum Archive »

Original post: Specktackular

I think he uses the terms "devil" and "Devil" interchangeably sometimes. Basically, I think what he's saying is that divination and evocation are trading reason and liberty for fate, which takes away our reason and liberty (ie. God's gift to us). In other words, rather than trusting our own judgement, we rely on some spectre or predestiny.

Remember, he said:
"God Himself is the free reason of all that exists.

The devil, on the other hand, is fatal irrationalism.

To forswear one's reason or one's liberty is disown God.

To make any appeal to what is irrational or fatalistic is to evoke the devil."
Also, he makes the point about becoming a unbalanced magnet for our desires when we evoke for our own profit. Basically, going against nature, I guess... but, is it really? If we can do it, isn't it natural?

Levi has a real Christian take on things, but Esoteric Christianity. He does not reject the wisdom of the ancients, but he believes Christianity to be the rightful evolution for some reasons I am not entirely clear on. I know that he believes Monotheism is an advancement over Polytheism or Pantheism. I'm still trying to figure out exactly what he believed. For instance, the very next paragraph in this Evocation chapter went on to talk about the first Pope and how he enshrouded the Catholic Church in black magick.

Levi was a priest or monk (can't remember) who was basically kicked out of the Church for voicing contrary opinions.

Some of his wording really makes it all seem that much more creepy! I'm sure his intention.

BTW, Crowley thought he was the reincarnation of Eliphas Levi.

Occult Forum Archive
Magister
Magister
Posts: 287885
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:32 am

Levi on Evocation vs. Magick Psychology

Post by Occult Forum Archive »

Original post: KCh

It is a very interesting book isn't it?

He is speaking of contrary forces of course. Neither one should be seen as better than the other; speaking of God and the Devil here. It is the equalibrium of contrary force that is sought. So Levi is quite true in such respect. The conflict and synthesis of the two produce evolution of self.

As for the church being 'enshrouded' in Black Magick, I couldn't agree more. They seek to halt the progress of humanity by mystical and religious stagnation. There is no greater enemy to spiritual progress than a church which shuns change at every degree.

Occult Forum Archive
Magister
Magister
Posts: 287885
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:32 am

Levi on Evocation vs. Magick Psychology

Post by Occult Forum Archive »

Original post: Specktackular

Kch, it seems very much like Levi sees God as better than the devil.

In the "Tree of Life," Israel Regardie comments on (and makes light of) Levi's tendency to freak out over Black Magic. (pg. 356 in the Ciceros' edition of Regardie's "The Tree of Life"). I don't have everything Levi ever wrote, so much of what Regardie was commenting on I can not vouch for, but it seems to me that in the above quotes from Levis "The Great Secret" that he is not being tongue-in-cheek, but that he really believes evocation (and divination, commented on elsewhere) are very, very bad indeed!

His logic seems to be this:
- our ability to reason is what separates us from beasts.
- the devil is described as "the beast"
- eschewing logic in favor of irrational fatalism is necessarily invocation of the beast

But, if the beast only operates through man, which Levi makes clear, and if as Levi points out elsewhere Satan's occupation truly is ridiculously unbelievable; existing only to thwart man repeatedly... Then, I am confused as to what force this irrational fatalism actually IS in the eyes of Eliphas Levi!!!

Occult Forum Archive
Magister
Magister
Posts: 287885
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:32 am

Levi on Evocation vs. Magick Psychology

Post by Occult Forum Archive »

Original post: KCh

We should make sure to understand that an author often times evolves in his work, which includes his writing. Opinions and conclusions that were once held are seen as a step to the next opinion and conclusion which is far superior than the first. Perhaps he saw himself as a Christian exploring all this devilish madness for the greater education of his brotherhood. Then again it sometimes seems that his Christian language is a mask in an attempt to explore and expose this knowledge to mankind during his lifetime without seeming as part of it. We may never actually know.

With this in mind I'll quote Levi's most popular work translated by Waite under the title 'Transcendental Magic' which includes this snippet from his 'Ritual' of Magic:

"Let us state now for the edification of the vulgar, for the satisfaction of M. le Comte de Mirville, for the justification of the demonologist Bodin, for the greater glory of the Church, which persecuted Templars, burnt magicians, excommunicated Freemasons, etc.-let us state boldly and precisely that all inferior initiates of the occult science and profaners of the Great Arcanum, not only did in the past, but do now, and will ever, adore what is signified by this alarming symbol.(The Devil)...But the adorers of this sign do not consider, as we do, that it is a representation of the devil: on the contrary, for them it is that of the god Pan, the god of our modern schools of philosophy, the god of the Alexandrian theurgic school and of our own mystical Neoplatonists, the god of lamartine and Victor Cousin, the god of Spinoza and Plato, the god of the primitive Gnostic schools; the Christ also of the dissident priesthood.

Occult Forum Archive
Magister
Magister
Posts: 287885
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:32 am

Levi on Evocation vs. Magick Psychology

Post by Occult Forum Archive »

Original post: Specktackular

If, as you suggest, the author often times evolves in his work, it is important to realise that Transcendental Magic dates from 1855, while the Great Secret dates from 1868!

The above quote from Transcendental Magic explains that "inferior initiates/profaners of the Great Arcanum view Baphomet as the god Pan" and by contrast points out that he himself (Levi) views it simply as The Devil.

Levi was well-versed in occult matters, so I would not expect him to be ignorant of Pan. However, Christianity teaches that all other gods but Jehovah are false gods and the devil. He is not claiming Baphomet as an equal of Christ, he clearly condemns this view as those of inferior initiates, but he makes the point that TO THEM, the dissident priesthood (aka "inferior initiates"), it is THEIR "Christ."

He is poetically putting them down, it seems. This is in line with his belief that the Christian monotheism is the rightful evolution of spirituality.

Occult Forum Archive
Magister
Magister
Posts: 287885
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:32 am

Levi on Evocation vs. Magick Psychology

Post by Occult Forum Archive »

Original post: Specktackular

Ah, your point here is sinking in... "Then again it sometimes seems that his Christian language is a mask in an attempt to explore and expose this knowledge to mankind during his lifetime without seeming as part of it." It does seem that "the god of our modern schools of philosophy, the god of the Alexandrian theurgic school and of our own mystical Neoplatonists, the god of lamartine and Victor Cousin, the god of Spinoza and Plato" is a hard thing to reject as "evil". Then, to get the mind working he adds "the god of the primitive Gnostic schools; the Christ also of the dissident priesthood." Now, I see what you are saying about Levi and now I understand better what Regardie was saying. Levi was very tricky if this is what he was doing. It honestly blew right over my head.

This makes me re-think this whole bit about "dressing up like the devil and looking in a mirror"... Levi could almost be saying here something about "mind over matter" or "as within, so without," etc. Thanks, Kch!

Post Reply

Return to “Ceremonial Magick”